When first-degree murder isn’t enough

Three human beings are dead after being murdered in cold blood by two crazed gunmen.  The alleged killers have been apprehended by police.  Any civilized society should have no problem bringing about justice based on those two facts alone.  The only legitimate question left is whether to execute the perpetrators or to lock them up and throw away the key.  Or so you’d think:
Police are investigating whether the shootings of five African-Americans in Tulsa, Oklahoma, were a hate crime after the weekend arrests of two white suspects in the case, local authorities said Sunday.

Why? What will a “hate crime” classification change?  Is the Tulsa police department incompetent, necessitating federal involvement? CNN and ABC News both spend half their stories contemplating the racial motivation of the killers, as if that will make the pre-meditated murders any more or less horrific.  The crimes are an attack on our common humanity.  Using the acts of madmen to attempt to weave a tale about race relations in America only causes more divisiveness:

Police officials said it was too soon to attribute the attacks to race, but community leaders expressed concern about the motivation for the shootings, as well as the possibility that they would provoke a vigilante response, the Associated Press reported.

What would a “vigilante response” entail?  The suspects are in custody.  The only “concern about the motivation” should pertain to the prosecutor’s ability to prove it in a court of law, enabling a conviction for first-degree murder. Continue reading