Ben and Jerry’s campaign to shut themselves up

Blessed with the moral authority that naturally derives from aiding countless women distraught from breakups gain weight, Ben of “…& Jerry’s” fame is using the fortune he amassed through his corporation to financially advocate for a Constitutional amendment while sending the message that corporate money should not be used to influence the political process. Yahoo’s The Lookout blog reports:

Ben Cohen, co-founder of Ben & Jerry’s ice cream and one of the deep pockets behind the Occupy movement, says he is helping launch a campaign this summer to highlight the influence of corporate money in American politics.

Cohen and the Move to Amend advocacy group will distribute rubber stamps with anti-corporate election spending messages so that the politically minded can mark their dollar bills. The end goal: To secure a constitutional amendment saying corporations do not enjoy the same protected rights as individuals and that money is not a form of speech.

Cohen plans to put a giant stamping machine on a national tour in August to encourage “thousands of people to buy rubber stamps and stamp any currency that comes into their possession,” he tells Yahoo News. According to his attorney, this is legal, as long as the bills are still legible after the stamping. The Occupy movement tried the stamp tactic last October, defacing dollar bills with infographics that showed the income distribution in American society.

The Tea Party has consistently been derided as mindless zombies directed by the nefarious Koch Brothers dollars. On the other hand, all the money in the world can’t pull an original thought out of Occupy Wall Street, to the point where they literally need to be handed rubber stamps with pre-approved slogans. Not shocking that these people find themselves unemployed when even their protesting could be more efficiently handled by toddlers at a day care center. $100K in debt to “learn how to think”, and your skillset doesn’t include developing your own stale slogans, such as:

This round of stamps will include “Corporations are not people,” “Money is not speech” and “Not to be used for bribing politicians,” among other slogans.

Individual people using corporate money to say “corporations are not people”, and stamping messages on dollar bills, essentially speaking through the currency, to teach us that “money is not speech”. Makes you want to slap a bumper sticker on your car that says “Irony is not an adjective for spinach”.

As for the third example, a bit of thought reveals an inherent flaw in progressive logic. The slogan assumes, correctly, that politicians are a dishonest bunch especially susceptible to bribes. Having established that, why do progressives then insist on transferring most all power to central government, which is managed by those same dishonest politicians?

The amendment for which Cohen is advocating would reverse decades of Supreme Court decisions, which have extended free speech and other rights to corporations and have ruled that spending money is a form of protected speech. The Citizens United Supreme Court decision in 2010 held that corporations and unions can spend unlimited amounts of money during elections as long as they are not directly funding individual candidates. (This led to the rise of independent super PACs, which have poured millions of dollars into this election cycle alone.) The decision overturned existing campaign finance laws.

Ben, and Jerry’s, goal is to use their corporate dollars to fund perpetual adolescents who naively agree with the progressive vision of government. Others who choose the SuperPAC route simply advocate specific politicians who they believe agree with their vision. The distinction lacks much of a difference, as either way “the 1%” with the deepest pockets exercise outsized influence on the political process. And that set up is not all for the worse. While I appreciate OWS acting out for all to see the degenerative nature of progressive philosophy, their shielding of sexual assault and attempted bridge bombing are troublesome. Maybe Ben Cohen’s bankrolling will lure them back into civilized society. In the meantime, let’s not forget that the true currency politicians need is our votes. If United States citizens are now the types whose votes can be bought and sold by corporations, or tricked by clever SuperPAC ads, then we are surely getting the politicians and government we deserve.

Breakdown of Saturday’s headlines: common sense to common headaches

the log of the political part the common sense...

In his weekly address, President Obama (con)descended from his cloud of nuanced genius to push “a few common-sense policies that would make a difference” with the economy, boiled down so completely that even we peons could understand. Later in the day, Rick Santorum used weaponized hypocrisy to give Obama a headache. We may have jumbled that last sentence, so here is our full breakdown of the bias from this Saturday’s MSM headlines:

1. CNN: “Hypocrisy in same-sex marriage debate?
Black church leaders arguing against same-sex marriage are making some of the same arguments that supporters of slavery made, some historians say”

Well if “some historians” are saying so… but what about the rest of the historian lot, who we’ll call “historians able to make distinctions”? The article criticizes the method of argument, but is noticeably light on substance (i.e. addressing the difference between skin color and sexual actions).  As if previous distortions of Scripture have made the source illegitimate for all, well, eternity. For good measure, the CNN Belief blog author quotes a lamentation that black churches are on “the wrong side of history”. Maybe, but what side of meaningless clichés are they on?  Read more of this post

Higher Education another bubble waiting to pop

Day 3 of the protest Occupy Wall Street in Man...

(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Next time you throw a BBQ and Mrs. Smith is boring you with another tedious conversation on her son’s college prospects, throw this grenade: “I believe too many people go to college.” Watch the jaws drop as you blast this tired piece of conventional wisdom. People unthinkingly accept the current system, where even low skill jobs often require a college degree, and never question why. Has everyone blocked out all the lazy stoners and drunks who coasted to degrees alongside us, and refused to contemplate whether over $100K to “get a piece of paper” made any sense for these slackers? Employers know college is the new high school and use that piece of paper as a minimum bar certifying someone’s ability to write in complete sentences. We now accept a premise that disqualifies 70% of the workforce from decent paying jobs.

A sister conversation to that, one new parents are familiar with, starts with a question: “Have you already started saving up for college? Hope so, because by the time he’s 18 it’s gonna cost…” The questioner waits for your eyeballs to glaze over and your shoulders to slump, to which they will sagely nod. A simple response will turn this back on them: “No, I’m not worried about it. College education costs are a bubble that is bound to pop well before then.” Your reward will be a look of confusion, followed by a slowly dawning realization, “Shoot, why hadn’t I thought of that before?” It’s as if the housing bubble, where the same “costs will only go up” argument was prevalent, taught us nothing. Sadly, our elected central planners clearly haven’t learned from it, as Yahoo’s The Ticket reports:

Senate Republicans blocked a vote Tuesday on a bill that would have extended the current low 3.4 percent interest rate on Stafford student loans, taking issue with how the Democratic bill would fund the extension. If Congress fails to pass such an extension by July, the rates will double.

Unfortunately the gridlock is over whether to even pay for this extension, and not whether it’s a good idea in the first place. But it should be:  Read more of this post

Try Occupying China

If Occupy protesters spent less time rioting on Communist holidays and re-enacting scenes from Fight Club, they might have had a chance to check the news and gain a little perspective on how ‘bad’ they have it in this country.

A few headlines today regarding the Occupoopers:

Seattle mayor issues emergency order after May Day mayhem

Occupy San Francisco takes over building, vandalizes cars and buildings

Labor Unions Occupy LAX Airport

Anarchist ring busted by feds, plotted bombings in Cleveland

While the Occupy movement may have begun as an understandable, though inchoate, frustration with the crony capitalism that helped lead to the financial collapse, it’s devolved into anarchic, Greek-style, temper tantrums. (In the video on the Seattle link above, you can see the Anarchy symbol painted on the window.  And the way they’re dressed, I’m betting they cut out the part of the video where the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles showed up to take on Shredder.)

Perhaps they’d be more grateful for their lot in life if they’d experienced real oppression:  Read more of this post

7 movies that inspired Occupy Wall Street

At the Occupy London protest, a man wearing a ...

(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Word is spreading that Occupy Wall Street protestors are planning ‘global disruption’ for International Workers’ Day. Many will be wearing Guy Fawkes masks popularized by V for Vendetta, a movie so ridiculously awful that it remains the only one where I’ve walked out of the theatre halfway through. In that spirit, here are seven more movies from which Occupiers have drawn inspiration, and their not so great results.

1. Rounders
Occupy protestors slowly filled up every seat of the Caesars Palace poker room in Atlantic City. Once in place, they then took turns folding every hand to the big blind. Occupiers were thrilled to offer this example of everyone operating in a way that ensured financial equality, with no winner or losers. However, they made one embarrassing oversight, and had to leave after the casino had siphoned off all their money through the rake. So maybe there were losers, but at least everyone shared in the misery!

2. Moneyball
Occupiers were inspired by Oakland A’s manager Billy Beane achieving success on a small budget through identification of market inefficiencies. They sat around for days trying to think up new, outside-the-box ways to efficiently distribute money across society. After hours upon hours of drawing blanks, they decided to call it quits after one member in a deep trance blurted out “I got it! Capitalism!” and another recommended hiring a Wall Street financial analyst as a consultant.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 39 other followers

%d bloggers like this: